Blunders at East Devon: a natural history
The errors found by Fritz5 from the Premier and Major games at East Devon can be classified by tactical theme and perhaps also by psychological theme - what type of thinking was at fault?
I'm not ever so confident about the classification scheme - I have a feeling that it could be sharpened up a lot. In research, you would get a couple of other people to come up with their own classifications and then compare notes, and perhaps some of the vaguer categories like 'attack and defence' could be divided up into 'weakening moves', 'failure to use reserve pieces', and so on.
Here's the final tally. [Once you start counting, you can get away from mere 'natural history' towards a science of blunders.] There were 111 games with blunders, but some games had more than one important blunder. Please also remember that for every game with a blunder, there was a game free from blunder, and that even in the most flawed game more moves were sound than unsound.
|
Errors by tactical theme |
Errors by psychological theme |
|
Geometry = 55 |
Blindness = 92 |
|
King safety = 49 |
Emotional errors = 42 |
|
Phases = 30 |
Thinking errors = 22 |
|
Analysis = 11 |
Material errors = 19 |
|
Attack and defence = 11 |
Attack and defence = 11 |
|
Blindness = 9 |
Phases = 1 |
|
Strategy = 3 |
Tactical themes.
Most common are the group of simple tactical themes, and tactics involving the King. I was surprised by the latter, since I thought most players were very careful of their Kings. Perhaps it has to do with the various ways in which a game can be compromised by a wobbly King, and the often sharper finishes which were missed by players who were already winning. Have a look at the examples under this heading (index below) and see what you think.
The simple geometrical motifs are readily absorbed, but we must make sure we know all the common ones. I was astonished a while ago to find that Dave Beckwith, comfortably 130 strength plus (1500+ ELO) without ever seeming to practice, had never seen the smothered mate known as Philidor's legacy, using Queen and Knight against a castled King.
The next most common group, 'phases', is dominated by endgame errors. However dismal computers are at endgames, and they are pretty ropy, we are worse.
Analytical errors - like move order - accounted for a few blunders, but hardly more often than real act of blindness, like leaving material hanging! Hopefully, awareness of both sorts of blunder can feed back to your habits of thought: try ideas in different orders to see if they work better, or check to see that your pieces really are still protected at the end of a sequence of moves.
Psychological themes
The most common types of blunder seem to have nothing interesting psychological about them - they are simply oversights, and all one need do to avoid them is look twice. However, because we are obviously thinking about something when it is our turn to move, why aren't we thinking about more important stuff? Presumably, we think what we are thinking about we regard as important, but while distracted by important higher-order things, we can overlook the basics.
There's really not a lot of research around on how ordinary chess players actually spend their time at the board when its their move, so your own notes and recollections are probably the best guide to your own errors - are you looking only for your own opportunities, or are you too worried about your weak a-Pawn to look for imminent threats?
The next big block are what I have rudely, but probably not inaccurately, called emotional errors. Neither hope nor despair are friends to the chessplayer. Remaining calm and effective throughout each move of a long game is a tough challenge, but is a goal to be sought. Perhaps you can at least 'turn down the volume' on any nerves while it's your turn to move - you have work to do which is not helped by feeling gloomy about the game.
What morals - or immorals - do you draw from these figures?
Classification of tactical themes
|
Category |
Theme |
All |
Games |
|
Blindness = 9 |
Hanging pieces/Pawns |
9 |
|
|
Geometry |
Pin |
13 |
|
|
55 |
Fork |
16 |
|
|
|
Skewer |
1 |
|
|
|
Double Attack |
5 |
|
|
|
Overload/decoy |
9 |
|
|
|
Unmasking |
5 |
|
|
|
No retreat |
3 |
|
|
|
Mixed themes |
3 |
|
|
Main aim |
King safety/mating attack |
47 |
10 12 15 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 29 29 30 33 34 46 53 61 62 64 68 69 71 73 74 74 81 82 88 89 89 91 95 98 101 104 108 110 110 111 |
|
49 |
Back rank |
1 |
|
|
|
F7 |
1 |
|
|
Analysis |
Analysis |
2 |
|
|
11 |
Intermezzo |
2 |
|
|
|
Horizon effect |
2 |
|
|
|
Undermining |
5 |
|
|
Attack and defence |
Line-opening |
2 |
|
|
11 |
Clearance |
1 |
|
|
|
Sacrifices |
6 |
|
|
|
Defence |
1 |
|
|
|
Weakening moves |
1 |
|
|
Strategy |
Bind |
1 |
|
|
3 |
Plan |
1 |
|
|
|
Seventh rank |
1 |
|
|
Phases |
Opening themes |
10 |
|
|
30 |
Endgame/queening |
20 |
Classification of psychological errors
|
Category |
Theme |
All |
Games |
|
Blindness |
Opportunity |
27 |
4 6 11 14 15 17 26 29 33 39 40 42 43 45 69 72 76 78 84 87 88 92 93 99 106 110 111 |
|
92 |
Threat |
34 |
6 7 18 28 29 31 35 38 47 48 50 51 54 56 63 71 73 73 74 79 80 83 90 92 93 97 97 98 104 104 105 108 109 109 110 111 |
|
|
Incisiveness |
29 |
1 5 10 18 19 19 33 40 49 53 59 60 62 68 69 73 75 76 77 77 79 82 85 86 87 89 98 100 |
|
|
Finishing off |
2 |
|
|
Thinking errors |
Analysis |
9 |
|
|
22 |
Routine moves |
6 |
|
|
|
Move order |
3 |
|
|
|
Horizon |
3 |
|
|
|
Wrong rook |
1 |
|
|
Material errors |
Material |
8 |
|
|
19 |
Positional sac. |
7 |
|
|
|
Planning |
1 |
|
|
|
Positional blunder /pointless moves |
3 |
|
|
Emotional errors |
Nerves/Bluff |
4 |
|
|
42 |
Bad to worse |
25 |
2 5 7 9 9 21 33 43 44 52 57 61 63 64 64 67 68 81 84 84 85 94 95 96 100 |
|
|
Rush of blood |
6 |
|
|
|
Panic |
4 |
|
|
|
Playing for a loss |
1 |
|
|
|
Pushing luck |
1 |
|
|
|
Rushed it |
1 |
|
|
Attack and defence |
Attack and defence |
8 |
|
|
11 |
Necessary attack |
2 |
|
|
|
Time trouble |
1 |
|
|
Phases = 1 |
Endgame |
1 |
Back to Chess Coaching Page
This document (blucount.html) was last modified on by
Dr. Dave
_