I had a call about a player who "doesn't like playing the Two Knights',
so what else is there?". This is a longer version of what I said
on the 'phone...[br /]
Playing Black after 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3
Classical repertoire
Defending the Italian Game with the Two Knights' Defence and the Ruy
Lopez with the Classical or other variation has always seemed to me to
be [a href="http://exeterchessclub.org.uk/content/cool-tips"]good advice[/url] (even if it isn't
advice I've ever been very good at
The minor pieces are bishop and knight (and the major
ones are
rook and queen). They are of roughly equal value (3 pawns, we
often say), but have such different powers of movement that they have
very different uses in the endgame.
To improve, you need to become an expert, not about
chess, but
about your chess. You need to know what there is to be good at,
and what you are good at, and what you are not good at yet.
James Drake, an occasional correspondent and freelance websoot
prifreader, writes:
"I note your recommendation to play
open openings when starting out to get more experience with tactics. I
wonder if this applies to correspondence games. I've been playing them
over the Internet the last few years and am at the stage where I get
creamed by opponents who know long lines of the Sicilian or Ruy Lopez.
Given that I've been somewhat influence by Purdy's recommended openings
in
Action
Chess
" My question to you is this; I have
pretty much settled on the Colle system for my opening but cannot find
a
defense that I like playing. I am not trying to be a Grand Master or
anything I just want to be a good solid player. I've been thinking
about
the Tarrasch and the Modern. The Modern from what I've read can be used
for just about any White opening which I guess is what I would prefer
(I'm not sure that is aggressive enough for me). The Tarrasch is just
an
answer to Queen Pawn openings; then I would have to learn a defense for